Edinburgh Fringe Comedy: A Critic's Perspective on Star Ratings and Reviews

Brian Logan, our comedy critic, recently addressed audience questions regarding the Edinburgh Fringe. He touched upon various aspects, from offering guidance to aspiring comedians to the significance of critical reviews and the very notion of the "Fringe" itself.

A common theme in the questions was the perceived importance of star ratings in Fringe reviews. For instance, Achhca inquired about the weight of these ratings, noting how a four-star review can significantly boost a show's visibility, while a three-star rating might feel like a setback. They asked about the criteria used and whether the knowledge of a potential poster placement influences the rating.

Similarly, brion questioned the scarcity of five-star reviews, seeking to understand the rubric behind such a high score.

In response, Brian Logan explained his approach: "I try to think about star ratings as little as possible. My job, as I see it, is to write something insightful, respectful and hopefully entertaining about a show; and to express all I have to say about that show in words." He acknowledged the practical, albeit reductive, usefulness of star ratings for some, but admitted a personal preference against them, lamenting how his own children prioritize the score over his thoughts on a performance.

Despite his reservations, Logan concedes the reality of the situation, noting, "But: let’s not take ourselves too seriously!" He referenced a critic who, reputedly, avoided three-star reviews due to their perceived lack of readership. However, Logan believes most shows fall into the "three-star" category – competent, enjoyable, and good, though not exceptional. He strives to lean towards enthusiasm, acknowledging the sting of negative reviews from his own experience.

When asked about the impact of reviews, Logan stated, "They matter to me." He finds personal enrichment and improved understanding of art through cross-referencing reviewers' opinions. He expressed surprise that anyone might feel differently. Regarding their influence on a show's ultimate success, he found it less clear, acknowledging that it "Depends on the show. Depends on the circumstances." Nevertheless, he concluded that reviewers are an integral part of the ecosystem that responds to art, influencing how it is "received, understood and savoured." He added, "And the world would be more drab and undistinguished without them. (But then, I would say that…)"